Originally published August 8, 2007
I recently received an e-mail from one of my early clients. After having worked in four different companies in four different industries, she came to a sad conclusion, writing:
“The thing that they all have in common is a desire to cut corners and deal with quality later. It takes a lot of energy to be the information quality cheerleader, and I find it discouraging and overwhelming at times. Keep writing your articles and books to encourage all the people like me who are dealing with these issues every day.”
The discovery that P. G. has experienced is, unfortunately, the norm – not the exception. There are two critical elements in this experience.
The first is embedded in W. Edwards Deming’s Second Point (of his 14 Points of Quality), “Adopt the New Philosophy: ‘Reliable product and service reduces costs.’” However, Dr. Deming said point two “really means a transformation of [American style] management” (The Deming Management Method, p. 59).
“We can no longer tolerate commonly accepted levels of mistakes, defects, material not suited for the job….” (Out of the Crisis, p. 26.)
Mistakes, errors and untimely information all increase costs of doing business. Management that does not go to Gemba may insulate it from knowing how wasteful their processes are when defective information causes processes to fail, incurring costs of failure itself, the cost to recover from the failure and data correction (data cleansing) required.
The second part of this is that information quality (IQ) professionals must not just complain that management does not listen to them and change their “defective” management practices. We must be more than “cheerleaders.” We must be missionaries, calling for a conversion from the practices of managing based upon time to delivery and costs alone, which invariably reduces quality while increasing costs of failure and information scrap and rework.
Kaoru Ishikawa, one of the eminent Japanese quality gurus used to say that if we are going to solve problems, we must “speak with data.” We must remember that management needs data that illuminates a problem so they can make the right decision. IQ professionals need to understand their manager’s need for information and provide that data in a way that is compelling and true.
Most managers believe that their processes are working properly because their organization is making a profit. If they have never measured the costs caused by defective information, they feel there is no need to change.
So, the most important quality management process to address this management situation is TIQM® (Total Information Quality Management) Process, P3: “Measure the Cost of Poor Quality Information” (Improving Data Warehouse and Information Quality, pp. 199-235.)
If you feel you need training in this, I will be teaching a two-day seminar in Nashville, September 18-19. The seminar will include exercises in measuring and quantifying the costs of poor quality information. Mention that you learned about the seminar in this IQ Newsletter article, and you will receive a 10% discount off the fee. Click here for course description and registration information.
Find a business manager who is feeling some pain in their business area caused by poor quality information. They will be delighted if you can help them measure the costs of poor quality and then improve the upstream processes to eliminate the root cause so they can eliminate the wasteful information scrap and rework activities and become more productive.
Management has basically three choices in the emerging “realized” Information Age. They can:
What do you think? Let me hear from you at Larry.English@infoimpact.com.
Recent articles by Larry English