Business Intelligence, Social Media and Social Protests
Originally published August 20, 2013
For those of us that monitored the role social media played in the in the uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa that are generally referred to as the “Arab Spring,” it seemed obvious that there was an important connection between these popular movements and the use of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other similar sites. The relationship seemed important enough for both academia as well as the U.S. government to spend a fair amount of resources trying to understand precisely that role and how it might be channeled and/or leveraged in the future.
First, the role of social media in shaping the debate was clear. Their research shows intense use of social media by the educated urban youth, both men and women, for political conversations. It also helped that this important segment of the population – median age in Tunisia is 30 and in Egypt it is 24 – are already heavy users of mobile phones. (There are 93 cell phones on the street for every 100 Tunisians and 67 for every 100 Egyptians.)
Given that this demographic was already actively using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, it is not strange that they should resort to these sites as a principal forum for their discussions. This public dialogue, in turn, put substantial pressure on the governments of both Egypt and Tunisia.
In addition, videos became an important vehicle to spread news virally and often to “embarrass” the government, such as when the wife of Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, was featured on YouTube using a government jet to make expensive shopping trips to Europe.
The importance of social media seemed to be underscored when it was revealed that one of the heroes of the Egyptian protests was Wael Ghonim, a Google executive in Cairo, who opened an influential Facebook group.
Second, increased volumes of online transactions seemed to be good indicators that something important was imminent. While the authors demur on “whether online conversations were driving street protests or whether the presence of a large volume of people in the streets was feeding an ongoing discussion online,” the evidence was incontrovertible about what was happening in cyberspace as regimes were falling. “Conversations about liberty, democracy, and revolution on blogs and on Twitter often immediately preceded mass protests.” They cite the interesting statistic that 20% of all blogs in Tunisia, up from 5% the month before, “were evaluating Ben Ali’s leadership on the day he resigned.”
Right before Mubarak left office, tweets from Egypt, or about political change in Egypt, went from 2,300 a day to 230,000 a day and videos about the demonstrations skyrocketed. The report points out that “the top 23 videos received nearly 5.5 million views.”
The sharp increases in the use of social media just before key events were remarkable. As business intelligence practitioners, we can start to think of how we might develop predictive analytics around these happenings.
Third, social media facilitated the spread of democratic ideas across borders. On the day Ben Ali resigned there were “over 2,200 tweets from Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco and Yemen” about the resignation. The authors’ evidence is strong that democracy advocates leveraged social media to connect with individuals in other countries that could both inform the world about the situation in Egypt or Tunisia, while at the same time finding a source of support from the individuals in these networks. In many cases, their interactions appeared to have in turn fueled many of the protests that erupted later on in countries like Bahrain and Yemen.
The day Mubarak left office over 225,000 Tweets outside of Egypt informed the world of his departure. After the resignation, news about the Egyptian crisis sent by tweeters from neighboring countries averaged 3,400 per week.
So, given that we now know that all these activities in Egypt and Tunisia were aimed at the governments, what did these regimes and their security apparatus do? As we might surmise, the hostile online activity brought about attempts to block social media, especially in an Egypt where there is a long tradition of censoring printed and broadcast media. When social media were targeted in Egypt, there was an effort to completely turn off the cyberspace switch. The government asked key Internet service providers (ISPs) to shut down; and for the better part of four days, there was a war of wits between the ISPs, Egyptian citizens and the government. The Muslim Brotherhood apparently worked via bloggers with London-based servers and hence was safe from being taken offline. Eventually the attempt to turn off the Internet failed, but the security forces became more skillful at both censoring the social media sites as well as anticipating events based on the alerts being provided by these sites.
The bottom line is that we now have some evidence that socialmedia did play an important role in the Arab Spring, and we are in the processof understanding better exactly what that role was. We are also eager todetermine whether it is also a key factor in the current round of protests inTurkey, Brazil and again in Egypt.We have to remember that already the 2009 protests against Moldova’s Communist regime were referred to as the “Twitter Revolution,” and there were even allegations of it being behind the protests surrounding the 2009 elections. It was these arguments and the outpouring of sentiment about how social media was going to change the world for the better that prompted a former U.S. national security adviser to suggest that Twitter should receive the Nobel Peace Prize. This, in turn, led Malcolm Gladwell to offer his case against social media as the key driver of revolution. In his New Yorker article “Small Change,” Gladwell points out that revolutions require individuals who are going to be willing to step into harm’s way and take real physical risks in the streets. Interestingly enough, he points to the spread of sit-ins during the Civil Rights movement as a counter-example of how an event or activity could go viral even before the Internet existed.
In Egypt, it was the soccer fan clubs accustomed to fighting each other, and the police, at games and stadiums that took the front lines and manned the barricades. But these individuals, who might have been called hooligans in their sports context, had been politicized by the social media and became allies and supporters of the activists against the regime.
The results from the research done by the University of Washington shows that there certainly were some important influences and facilitating factors where social media played a role. It’s not clear what the full impact and the nuances were, so more work has to be done. But these are exciting times as business intelligence practitioners attempt to sort out the wheat from the chaff, the noise from the signal, in all of this data.
Recent articles by Dr. Ramon Barquin
Copyright 2004 — 2020. Powell Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
BeyeNETWORK™ is a trademark of Powell Media, LLC