We use cookies and other similar technologies (Cookies) to enhance your experience and to provide you with relevant content and ads. By using our website, you are agreeing to the use of Cookies. You can change your settings at any time. Cookie Policy.


Blog: Craig Schiff Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed!

Craig Schiff

I am very excited about this opportunity to share my perspectives and experience in my BeyeNETWORK Blog. For those of you who may not have read my articles and newsletters over the past few years, I hope you will appreciate a vendor-independent perspective on all things related to Business Performance Management (BPM). I focus on key topics organizations should consider throughout their BPM project lifecycle, from early stage requirements definition and justification, key measure development, vendor selection and finally, successful deployment and rollout. Of course, market trends and vendor updates will also be part of the mix. Please stop by on a regular basis to see what's new, and to make this interactive, please share your opinions. If you have a specific question, contact me directly at cschiff@bpmpartners.com.

About the author >

Craig, President and CEO of BPM Partners, is a pioneer in business performance management (BPM). Craig helped create and define the field as it evolved from business intelligence and analytic applications into BPM. He has worked with BPM and related technologies for more than 20 years, first as a founding member at IMRS/Hyperion Software (now Hyperion Solutions) and later cofounded OutlookSoft where he was President and CEO.

Craig is a frequent author on BPM topics and monthly columnist for the BeyeNETWORK. He has led several jointly produced webcasts with Business Finance Magazine including "Beyond the Hype: The Truth about BPM Vendors," the three-part vendor review entitled "BPM Xpo" and "BPM 101: Navigating the Treacherous Waters of Business Performance Management." He is a recipient of the prestigious Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award. BPM Partners is a vendor-independent professional services firm focused exclusively on BPM, providing expertise that helps companies successfully evaluate and deploy BPM systems. Craig can be reached at cschiff@bpmpartners.com.

Editor's Note: More articles and resources are available in Craig's BeyeNETWORK Expert Channel. Be sure to visit today!

March 2006 Archives

Ever been to an IT chat room or forum? They are great places to get solid answers to pressing technical challenges. Leveraging the combined experience of all participants in the room or on the distribution list is probably one of the best ways to get a quick, authoritative answer to a detailed syntax or command question that the vendor failed to adequately document. However, I have recently seen these forums used for a purpose that I don't believe they are well-suited for: BI and/or business performance management vendor selection. The typical query runs something like this: 'we are a large, complex bank and we are looking at Microstrategy or Cognos to analyze our data, which would you recommend?' Just in case the problems with this approach aren't already obvious to you, let me spell them out.

First of all, most people in these groups use screen names so you don't know who you are really talking to. When getting technical help that doesn't really matter. When making a sizeable purchasing decision it matters a lot. Is 'BIGuru' a salesman for Cognos who will promote his product or a disgruntled ex-employee who will have nothing nice to say? The next issue is that to properly select a solution that you are going to live with for some time to come you really need to delve into your specific detailed requirements and match them up against the product choices and their capabilities. While product A may have worked quite well for someone else at a bank, it may not work well at all for you. Your requirements, at the detailed level, are most likely going to be different in some important ways from the people responding to your question. Lastly, let's take a look at what we are attempting to do here. We are looking to buy a BI or performance solution that will be strategically important to the company, probably cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when all is said and done (software+services+staff time), and live on for 5-7 years. Is this the way to make a decision of that magnitude? Of course not. You need to go through a comprehensive, structured process to determine your detailed requirements and evaluate all the viable vendors for this solution. An IT chat room can be one small step in a thorough due diligence process, but it certainly should not be the only step. I wonder how the senior executives in these companies would feel if they found out their BI/BPM experts used this as a primary means of selecting vendors?


Posted March 22, 2006 7:45 AM
Permalink | No Comments |

All of us so-called 'industry experts' have been talking about this topic for a while. We may call it master data or meta data or enterprise dimension management, but it all means the same thing. The question in my mind has been 'does the end user community see the same pressing need that we do?' Two recent data points have answered that question for me. I was asked to speak at a webcast on this topic, specifically focused on the chart of accounts dimension. Well, as it turned out the event was over-subscribed and we needed to schedule a second live run of the same webcast to handle the overflow crowd. In addition, we just completed our annual BPM Pulse Survey which asked nearly 500 respondents to rate the importance of a list of up and coming features of business performance management (predictive analytics, vertical solutions, etc.) and meta data management received the highest ratings. MDM/EDMs time has arrived.


Posted March 22, 2006 7:30 AM
Permalink | No Comments |

At a recent business performance management conference they had James Surowiecki as a speaker. He is the author of a book entitled 'The Wisdom of Crowds'. The fundamental pricnicple is this: if you take a diverse group of individuals and aggregate and average their input, you will get a better answer than just relying on any one individual, even an expert on the topic being discussed. I of course was skeptical at first, but he provided many examples to prove his point. The theory appears to work on everything from determining how many jelly beans are in a jar to forecasting future outcomes of today's business decisions. His hour-long speech from that event is now available here as an MP3 file (it's large, best to right-click and save target as). You can decide for yourself if it makes sense. If he's right, we probably need to change the way most business decision making is done, regardless of the underlying software and data warehouses that provide the information needed to make those decisions.


Posted March 2, 2006 11:47 AM
Permalink | No Comments |