David Stodder has a great expert analysis at Intelligent Enterprise, which considers the two recent announcements in the MDM world (Informatica's purchase of Siperian and Talend's announcement of its open source MDM product). I left this comment over there:
"One aspect to consider is the fact that the desire for implementing master data management is usually a symptom of deeper data management issues that have not been resolved. The promise of a "golden copy" or "single source of truth" belies the need for higher quality entity data. The problem is indeed as suggested in David's article: the people buying the solution have not thought out the scope of the work involved in transitioning an *enterprise* (with its scores, if not hundred or thousands of independent applications and spreadbasemarts) to committing to the use of a single "master data asset." So you end up with siloed master data implementations (which is an oxymoron if I ever heard one) that serve smaller workgroups. (Psst: really, that MDM implementation is YAID - yet another inconsistent database).
Meanwhile, I dealt with a lot of the questions that David Stodder has raised in the book that I wrote on Master Data Management, which apparently is being sold at a 48% discount at Amazon.
Posted February 2, 2010 7:32 AM
Permalink | No Comments |




Leave a comment