I'm often asked this question. It is a critical question for
you to answer for your Business Glossary program. Like many enterprise wide
data management programs we generally have to define the anticipated business value
and expected end result before we can gain funding for the program, both in
terms of the business and technical values.
And like many enterprise data management initiatives much of the
significant value proposition is intangible. What is the value of improved
communications, better use of data, or the ability to make better business
decisions? To create an economic estimate or ROI computation, one has to
understand what the value propositions are and then make some assumptions as to
the future value that will be achieved.
Honestly, I have not seen a formal ROI done for a business glossary
project yet. But everyone has done a definition of the anticipated value as
part of the funding effort. I have even seen the value definition completed in
an informal manner; "We really need to build one. Can you write a two page
description and value statement for me by 1PM?"
Many businesses are moving aggressively to counter data
ambiguity and understand by building business glossary applications and
governance. The glossary should be implemented to be used by all employees as a
means for business term understanding and everyday communications. An objective
of the glossary program should be to enable business communications such as
email requests for reporting, understanding marketing plans, legal
documentation and everyday communications. Technology professionals can
leverage the glossary content to use a common language when defining project requirements
or designing reports.
I suggest that the prime objective of a business glossary is
to improve the ability for individuals to have an understanding for critical
business concepts and thus improve communications across the diverse
organizations and geographies of an organization.
So let's start with a small list of the business value of a
Business Glossary.
The top value statements I see most often stated are:
·
To maximize (or improve) the understanding of
the core business concepts and terminology of the organization. A business
glossary can connect workers across the enterprise to critical business
information they can trust, helping to eliminate misunderstandings that cause
lost time, lost opportunities and lost revenue.
- To
minimize the misuse of data due to inaccurate understanding of the
business concepts and terms. To achieve this, we must manage the concepts
or business terms, the definition of each, and associated knowledge such
as who is responsible for the term, what metrics might be associated, how
the term should be used or not used, what other terms are related, or
which have been replaced by this term.
·
To maximize communications and understand across
the enterprise. For now I will avoid suggesting that we have a "common"
understanding since that suggests that there is one and one only one definition
of business concepts. We can agree to disagree as long as we name different
concepts differently. I'll have a few articles to discuss the issues of
creating great definitions, term naming and governance.
- To
improve the alignment of the business organizations with the technology
assets and organization. The terminology of the business can be aligned
with the technology implementations and assets. We can identify the BI
metrics, the applications, processes, databases, and data stewards that
are associated with business glossary terms. Yes, to achieve this
objective will require more than just the business glossary application.
Processes and people (governance) are also necessary, but the business glossary provides an enabling platform
- To
maximize the decision-making processes through better access to knowledge
of our business terms. A survey conducted by Accenture of 1,000 middle
managers of large companies identified that 42% of the managers in the
survey acknowledged that they had recently make erroneous business
decisions due to misunderstanding of terminology and data usage. Greater
understanding of business terms and usage can improve our management
decision making.
- To
maximize the accuracy of the results to "searches" for business
concepts, and associated knowledge. It is critical for people to find
information associated with the key business terms of the organization. We
all have done an Internet search for something only find nothing of actual
value from the 300 or more returned values. The Business Glossary application should
support the ability to "gain access to knowledge of the enterprise." This
often begins with a "search" for a term or list of terms
- To
support the data gvernance processes and team. Many organizations have started their
enterprise data governance programs with the creation of a business
glossary. When it is possible a governance team should be responsible for
the standards, processes, and lifecycle of the terms and definitions in
the business glossary. This is a great first effort for the governance
team.
- To
support the implementation of metadata processes or metadata technology
implementation. The Data Warehousing Instituteâ„¢ Research conducted a survey in
2010 to identify the benefits of improving metadata management. The
questions asked was "what would be
the benefits of improving metadata management?" The top 4 answers from
the respondents were:
- Better
data sharing across the enterprise (79%)
- More
compliant use of data (59%)
- Faster
response to change (52%)
- Reduced
data-related risk (49%)
You may want to
read this research report from TDWI entitled "Cost Justification for Metadata
Management" by Philip Russom.
A business glossary can fulfill a broad range of business
and technical objectives. Each enterprise should assess the objectives that are
critical for the business and technical challenges existing prior to initiating
a business glossary program.
I welcome your comments and feedback about the objectives
and challenges you have faced for your glossary implementation.
Lowell Fryman
Posted September 12, 2012 12:12 PM
Permalink | 1 Comment |



