Blog: Jill Dyche« CDI and MDM Hit the Road | Main | Microsoft Jumps Into MDM » Call Me Pollyanna. (But You Should Still Define Your Brand.)In which Jill realizes that the more things change, the more they stay the same. As in, just when you think everyone knows something, someone else comes up and asks a few basic questions about it and the whole thing begins anew. Sort of like an episode of The Sopranos… Wouldn’t it be nice to begin at the beginning? Just wave a magic wand and watch those legacy systems and silos and replicated, messy data all just disappear? Then we could be really agile with our customer relationship management, unencumbered by all that crazy data. Some companies—even those who have tried to remedy their data disarray—still have fundamental questions about their businesses. Like who their customers are. Last year I facilitated what can only be called an executive grudge match at an automobile company. The topic: Who are our customers? Yesterday’s news, you say? Move on already, say you? Nothing doing. As they had before, a handful of executives insisted that consumers—the people who bought the cars—were the customers. Other execs were ready to fall on their swords for the dealers. I’d kicked off the meeting with the simple question, “Who do you want to sell to, and who do you want to serve?” (Okay, call me Pollyanna.) And then I watched the fur fly! It would be great to capture the results of such meetings. (That is, when there are results.) We could develop our institutional memory, recording corporate knowledge, bearing witness to the evolution of our corporate decisions and strategies. Then we could apply those decisions to our branding, creating captivating and sensory messages to connect with people in a meaningful way, as author Mark Gobé advocates in his book, Emotional Branding. But first we need rules. Rules about what defines a customer, what defines a good customer, what defines a desirable prospect, and rules about how to treat them all when we have their attention. Not all customers are created equal. Not all brands are created equal. Not all companies are created equal either—unless, of course they decide to do exactly what their competitors are doing. Technorati Tags: CRM, customer relationship management, customer focus, business rules |
Comments
Hi Jill,
Good to see you out here, this is very interesting - and I think it coincides with the rise (again) in Governance (ITIL, CoBIT, ISACA, SEI/CMMI, etc..) along with metadata management. In defining rules, I feel it's important to govern all aspects of those rules - along with the metadata, and who has access to updating those rules.
Well, anyhow - if we're going to make the effort to sit down and make a difference (define the rules to begin with), then we should make the effort to govern the results so that there isn't a sunk cost down the road, and so that we don't see the law of rapidly diminishing returns on our hard-fought battles....
Just some thoughts, what do you think?
Thanks,
Dan L
Posted by: Dan Linstedt | June 6, 2007 7:37 PM
Dan: You've got it exactly right. Not only do we need the rules, we need to stop awaiting 100 percent consensus on the rules and decide who gets to make them, who gets to approve them, who's informed about them, and who's kept in the loop. Then we have to enforce the rules. To your point, the roles around the rules--the governance framework--may be as important as the rules themselves! Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Jill Dyche | June 10, 2007 7:51 AM